Stop Frontline Asset Strategies Debt Collection Harassment

Relentless calls from Frontline Asset Strategies (FAS) disrupting your peace? Despite their “compliant-first” marketing and BBB accreditation since 2011, this Roseville, Minnesota collector has faced multiple federal lawsuits alleging FDCPA violations.

If you believe Frontline Asset Strategies’ harassment crossed the legal line, you can recover up to $1,000 in damages, plus attorney’s fees. Call +1 844-638-1122 to stop the calls today.

Who Is Frontline Asset Strategies

Frontline Asset Strategies (FAS) is a nationally licensed debt collection agency founded in 2008 and headquartered in Roseville, Minnesota. The company markets itself as compliance-focused with “positive, respectful consumer interactions,” yet has faced numerous federal lawsuits challenging this claim.

Despite BBB accreditation and marketing about ethical practices, Frontline Asset Strategies has been sued for allegedly failing to include dates on collection letters, overshadowing dispute rights, using misleading language, and demanding disputes in writing only.

Their “technology-driven, multi-channel communication” often translates to persistent calling from multiple numbers.

Address: 2700 Snelling Ave N, Suite 250, Roseville, MN 55113-1783

Visit their website at Frontline Asset Strategies or review federal court records through PACER to verify litigation history.

Frontline Asset Strategies Phone Numbers

If you receive calls from these numbers, you’re dealing with Frontline Asset Strategies (FAS):

Document every call from these numbers, including the date, time, and what was said.

When Frontline Asset Strategies Crosses Legal Lines

Frontline Asset Strategies’ harassment becomes illegal when their actions violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act or the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

Their documented violations include:

• Sending collection letters without dates (Devoe v. FAS, 2023)
• Overshadowing consumers’ right to dispute debts (Frontline/Velocity case, 2018)
• Demanding disputes be submitted in writing only (Boggerty v. FAS, 2018)
• Failing to specify if debt amounts are increasing (Molkandow v. FAS, 2017)
• Using misleading language about interest accrual (Lilavois v. FAS, 2017)
• Making calls outside 8 a.m. to 9 p.m. hours
• Contacting third parties about your debt
• Continuing calls after cease and desist

Review the full FDCPA requirements in the Federal Reserve guidance and ECFR regulations.

Federal Lawsuits Against Frontline Asset Strategies

Frontline Asset Strategies’ litigation history contradicts their compliance-focused marketing. Key cases include:

Recent Cases:

• Baines v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC (2024) – Ongoing litigation
• Devoe v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC (2023) – Alleged FDCPA violation for omitting dates on collection letters
• Sazonoff v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC (2021) – Consumer rights lawsuit
• Madorskaya v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC (2020) – Class action FDCPA claims; motion to dismiss denied

Earlier Cases:

• Boggerty v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC (2018) – Unlawful written dispute requirement
• Molkandow v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC (2017) – Failure to specify debt amount changes
• Suynov v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC (2017) – Deceptive collection practices
• Lilavois v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC (2017) – Misleading letters about interest
• Layton v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC (2016) – Eastern District of Missouri case

• Kern v. Frontline Asset Strategies, LLC et al

This pattern shows systemic compliance failures, not isolated mistakes.

Your Rights When Frontline Asset Strategies Contacts You

You have specific protections under federal law:

Demand Proper Validation

Request written proof, including the original creditor name, debt amount, and itemized charges. They must stop collecting until they verify.

Control Communication

Send cease and desist via certified mail. After receipt, they can only contact you to confirm cessation or notify you of lawsuits.

Protect Your Privacy

They cannot discuss your debt with family, friends, neighbors, or employers. Third-party disclosure violates the FDCPA.

Challenge Misleading Letters

If their letters lack dates, unclear language about increasing debt, or confusing dispute instructions (like the lawsuits allege), you may have a claim.

Sue for Violations

You can recover up to $1,000 per FDCPA lawsuit plus actual damages. They pay your attorney fees when you win.

How to Stop Frontline Asset Strategies Calls

Immediate actions:

1. Document everything – Every call (date, time, number from the table above, what they said)
2. Request written validation – Within 30 days of first contact
3. Send a cease and desist – Certified mail to their Roseville address
4. File complaints – CFPB, FTC, state attorney general
5. Call us – +1 844-638-1122 for a free evaluation

Keep records of misleading letters, especially those missing dates or unclear about whether the debt is increasing (issues in their lawsuits).

How Wood Law Firm PLLC Handles Frontline Asset Strategies Cases

We know Frontline Asset Strategies’ playbook because we’ve studied their federal lawsuits. When they claim compliance while their court record shows otherwise, we build cases using their own litigation history against them.

Our approach:

• Analyze your calls and letters for patterns matching their prior lawsuits
• Send legal demands citing specific violations within 48 hours
• Leverage their settlement motivation (they know the cost of losing in court)
• Pursue maximum damages – their repeated litigation shows willful violations

Why we’re effective: We work on contingency. You pay nothing unless we win, and Frontline Asset Strategies pays your attorney fees. This levels the playing field completely. Their decade of lawsuits proves they settle when facing experienced counsel.

Call +1 844-638-1122 now. We’ll stop the calls and pursue compensation.

Attorney Jeff Wood Holds Collectors Accountable

Jeff Wood founded this firm after watching debt collectors violate his family members’ rights without consequence. He dedicated his career to changing that equation – making collectors pay for the harm they cause.

Jeff has studied Frontline Asset Strategies’ litigation patterns across multiple federal cases. When a collector has been sued for omitting dates, overshadowing dispute rights, and using misleading language, those patterns reveal their weaknesses. Jeff knows exactly how to build cases they can’t defend.

His A+ BBB-rated practice focuses exclusively on consumer protection. When Frontline Asset Strategies markets compliance while their court record tells a different story, Jeff uses that contradiction to maximum effect.

What Our Clients Say About Us